Sex Blogs
|
Both original content and news automatically gathered from the best sex weblogs. |
-
Picture this
.... I do realize that a weblog is something that one should update once a day, ideally, and I seem...
-
Valentine?s Day Presents
Are your roses already starting to wilt and fade? Is that huge box of candy already half-gone, and down...
|
Whats Hot?
|
Drink 2-3 times a week for VIGOR and VITALITY! Fights Impotence, Stimulates the Body, Good for Sexual Organs, Kidney Problems, Fertility, Lack of Energy, Lowback pain, Invigorates Blood, Strengthens. Check out The Magic Mushroom |
|
|
Stevens Proposes Scaled-Back Child Protection Bill |
WASHINGTON — Unlike its previous iterations, the most recent version of the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act does not contain mandatory website labeling provisions for sexually explicit websites, according to the text of the bill as it appears on the Library of Congress website.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, has been introduced several times in various forms. In January, Stevens sponsored S. 49, a version of the bill that called for the Federal Trade Commission in conjunction with the office of the U.S. Attorney General to “promulgate regulations establishing clearly identifiable marks or notices to be included in the code, if technologically feasible, or on the pages or screens of a website that contains sexually explicit material to inform any person who accesses that website of the nature of the material and to facilitate the filtering of such pages or screens.”
In the current version of the act, S. 1965, there is no language proposing labeling of sexually explicit sites; now the bill merely calls for the establishment of an “online safety and technology working group” that will “review and evaluate … the status of industry efforts to promote online safety through educational efforts, parental control technology, blocking and filtering software, age-appropriate labels for content or other technologies or initiatives designed to promote a safe online environment for children.”
Following the proposal of S. 49 in January, ASACP Executive Director Joan Irvine sent a letter to Stevens in which she argued that the bill should be amended to remove the mandatory website labeling provision. Irvine wrote: “If these provisions become law, they will inevitably be challenged in court,” and asserted that private sector self-regulation would be more effective than a statute making such labeling mandatory. In the letter, Irvine also noted that the ensuing legal challenge of the labeling provisions would “polarize adult entertainment industry players against site labeling of any kind – whereas most would actually be willing to undertake self-labeling if it were voluntary.” Irvine told XBIZ that in addition to the letter, “I had meetings in Washington with senior staffers for members of both parties to let them know about what the industry was doing with [the Restricted to Adults label].” |
|
Sexy Girls Seeking...
|
Hello, I'm a hard working woman with goals and desires. Yep, I'm horney, but I keep it in good proportion and don't tolerate fools, flakes, asses, assheads, damfools, donkeys, doodles, idiots, imbeciles, jackasses, jerks, madmen, mooncalfs, nincoms, nitwits, pinheads, birdbrains, featherheads, pushovers, ho-hos, laughingstocks, dingdongs or of course any twinkees what so ever. Are you still with me? I like a good work out; hope you do too! |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
